Category Archives: Management

How to successfully implement a QHSE SaaS Platform

Software as a Service is, for most people, a new method of working with IT. This new method brings all new things and possibilities. But with these new possibilities comes a new adoption strategy. So how can you as QHSE manager successfully implement a SaaS platform within your organization and, more importantly, how can you involve people in the process?

Planning Is Key to Success

Yes, it may sound a little cliche. But planning is one of the most important foundations to make an implementation of a QHSE SaaS platform successful. Planning is essential for all the stakeholders, because everybody can prepare themselves for the total impact. In the planning, make sure people have crystal clear tasks they need to do. This makes it easy for them and give them guidance in their activity.

Stakeholder Management

Stakeholders determine the success of the platform. In the end, you want all the people to work with the platform to bring the QHSE management to the next level. With this knowledge, it is recommended to let the stakeholders take part in the beginning of the implementation. Let them, for example, discuss what the best settings are for them and which parts are the most important for them. When certain parts are very important for someone, (s)he will take more responsibility and ownership, which will make the implementation and adoption a lot easier. In the end, you do this together and not on your own.

Smart Small, Grow Big

The implementation of a SaaS platform has a big impact on your business. The daily process is changed and the stakeholders need to work differently than before. Therefore, it is recommended to start small, for instance, with one process. If you let your stakeholders adjust with this minuscule change first, they can adopt further changes much quicker and easier later on. To come back to the planning, do make sure you have some kind of plan for the bigger roll-out. 

Don’t Underestimate

Never underestimate the effects on your stakeholders. Most SaaS platforms are easy in use, but for some stakeholders it can still be difficult. So make sure that your stakeholders get enough training and enough opportunities to ask questions. When the training is good, the benefits will be there for years to come. 

At Qooling, ease-of-use is paramount, from the purchase to the implementation and use of the platform. Obviously, the Qooling team is always there to help. Qooling offers convenience within the platform, but also in the way customers can communicate with us. Convenience is not limited to the platform.

Published by:

The Impact of Technology on QHSE during COVID-19

We have touched upon the importance of technology in QHSE management already a couple of times. Of course, as we’re still going through a global pandemic, having the best digital tools is a must. This pandemic is not just a threat; as always, it also is a great opportunity. It is an excellent opportunity to rebuild the QHSE culture and make people aware of the importance of it. Obviously, the health and safety of the employees is important, that is crystal clear. However, people need to have access to all the information now they aren’t always in the office. The complete management system should be available, which is a great opportunity to increase engagement.

Accessibility

The working from home mantra and limited time at the office of the production facility has changed the way QHSE management is performed. You need to do your work without being at the office all the time and having much less interaction with the team of other people in the company. Most meetings are via Teams of Zoom, which reduces the interaction between people significantly. Because of this, it gets so much more important to be able to access all the QHSE information and data at just a simple click. This should be not only the case for you as the QHSE manager but for everybody in the organization. The management system should continue to function regardless of the personal connection in the office.

Change

The pandemic has a big impact on every organization and requires a change in most companies almost overnight. Even though we are getting more and more used to the situation, lots of things are still changing. The great QHSE solutions support companies by enabling these changes. People will get informed of the changes and are able to have online training to adopt these changes and get them in the fibers of the organization. 

Openness

The whole pandemic requires a lot more openness and transparency within the organization, not just about the topic, but also about all the things related to QHSE. Traditionally the QHSE department is the gatekeeper of the QHSE information and data. With the remote working situation, this can not be the case anymore, and the data has to be available to everyone in order for these people to start improvement projects based on the data. Giving this insight to everyone in the organization allows the company to get improvement initiatives for every department, which of course not only improves the business but also improves the engagement in the management system. Another significant effect of being more open is that employees are more willing to engage with the QHSE management system. They can see what the company is doing and how this is really helping the company forward.  

Published by:

Quality in Your Business Strategy

The position of Quality in the overall company strategy isn’t always clear. Yes, most companies claim that quality is their number one priority. This makes sense, as you can only deliver real value if you provide quality products and services. However, how this strategy is translated into the operation isn’t always clear. More often than not, it isn’t incorporated in the organization at all. Last week we talked with a couple of CEOs about how they try to accomplish this and what actions they take. We briefly touch upon the highlights of these discussions.

Empower Quality

Most companies we talked to have an internal quality department. The CEOs pointed out that in order to make quality deeply embedded in the organization, they need to change the role of the quality department. They want the quality department to support the operational departments with embedding quality within the processes. This way, it becomes part of the core processes and not a stand-alone thing. The CEOs also pointed out that it won’t be an easy transition, but it is crucial for the organization in order to execute the strategy. To accomplish this, they gave quality a seat at the table and involved it more in the strategic direction of the company.

Special Improvement Projects

Some of the organizations actually started some special projects to bring quality to the next level. One was a cross-department improvement board. Instead of keeping this main role with Quality, this particular organization made it a collaborative effort among different departments. It wasn’t always easy to coordinate, but it definitely changes the role of Quality within the organization. By bringing the knowledge of the departments together, they got a different point of view for these improvements, which led to some amazing solutions. There were a couple of points they learned during this process. The first is trying to include most opinions. When an organization starts something like this, there will always be certain people eager to help out, which is great. However, sometimes it makes a lot of sense to also hear people that might not be so vocal. It’s a good idea to change the configuration of the people that join the meetings or invite these people occasionally. The second point was about the follow-up. In the beginning, it is very important to keep momentum in these projects to make sure that everybody stays motivated. When momentum slows, certain people might tune out. And lastly was the support from upper management. It is very important that top management joins these meetings every now and then to support the project and show involvement.

Quality as a Department

Another great approach these companies clearly pointed out was the way they positioned quality within the organization. Quality was more like an internal audit and improvement department instead of a department that has to deal with the certificates. This way, quality really focuses on improvement and helping the business get to the next level. Another great result is that the organization is almost constantly ready to be audited by customers or certifying bodies.  

Changing an organization into this paradigm isn’t easy and will take time, but in the end, it will be good for the company. 

Published by:

The Impact of Certification Bodies on Companies

After talks with hundreds of quality and safety managers, we saw a pattern emerge we weren’t really aware of. We started to notice that there is some kind of implicit impact certification bodies (CB) have on companies. This impact can be quite severe, and we don’t think all CB or external auditors are aware of this. It basically comes down to being afraid to change because of what the external auditor might think of it.

Change

Implementing any kind of change in an organization is already hard to do. People have the natural ability to resist change with every fiber in their body. Finding a modus in which the company is willing to change can be quite challenging. You need very good reasons why this particular change moves the company forward. This is also where the continuous improvement in lots of the ISO standards gets challenging. They want the company to improve, and therefore change.

Impact of Certifying Body

Most external auditors have a great deal of impact on an organization, even though they are only there 3-5 days a year. They want companies to change or notice certain NCRs that need to be solved. This all can mean quite a workload for companies. Because the ISO certificate is a license to operate for many companies, they don’t really go against the auditor and simply implement what is required. This can lead to a non-functional management system because of so many different influences by all the external auditors. Even though this new management system isn’t really desired, some companies think it is the only way. The fact that the external auditors are able to force change is quite a good thing, even though we strongly believe you should never do something just for the auditor. Every change should always have value for the organization as well.

However, the external auditors also have a big negative impact on change, namely being afraid to change. Certain companies aren’t willing to change because they are afraid whether the external auditor accepts the new way of working. We get this question quite a lot ourselves, and luckily, have a big portfolio of companies to prove that the auditors are happy with it. The fact that these questions arise does show the big influence the certification body has on the choices the company makes, even though the external auditors are hardly there. Companies should be more willing to make their own decisions and be able to explain to the certification bodies why certain changes are made and that it is a net positive for the company.

Published by:

Lets Talk about Stakeholders

Ever since the introduction of the HLS (High Level Structure) in several ISO standards, the stakeholder analysis has a more prominent role in most Management Systems. This is a good thing if you ask us. However, most companies have been able to list and somehow categorize their stakeholders, but they are having a hard time managing them. Don’t get me wrong, managing stakeholders isn’t easy and requires a lot of effort. We ourselves can do a better job on this aspect every now and then.

Identifying Stakeholders

This is the most straightforward and easy exercise of managing stakeholders. Every company is capable of identifying their stakeholders and the impact every stakeholder has on the organization. Most analysis show a breakdown that look something like this:

  • Name of stakeholder
  • Impact on the organization
  • Level of influence
  • How to manage the stakeholder

It is not a hard science, but most of the assessments of the stakeholders hold some information like this.

Managing Stakeholders

After the identification of the stakeholders, they need to be managed, which is the hardest task. Every company manages their most important stakeholders with care, their customers. Yes, things go wrong here as well, but most processes in the organization are built to make customers happy. Hence, this stakeholder is managed pretty significantly. Then, the employees are well taken care of in most companies, bad actors aside. Without the employees, there is no company, so they need to be taken care of as well. Then we have the suppliers, these are well taken care of because a significant part the company depends on them, especially the critical suppliers.

In essence, most stakeholders are well informed when they are part of a process and when things are going as planned. It is when something doesn’t go according to plan that things start to break. We experience this over and over again, not just with our suppliers, but also within our company. This isn’t really a bad thing, as long as you are aware of the fact that you dropped the ball and this is where things are going wrong. When you point out that you haven’t been well informed, you see that people start to point to processes or systems. But like I mentioned before, the problem is that things didn’t go as planned, hence the missing information. Just make sure there is some kind of feedback loop in the organization to identify such situations and update the stakeholder analysis.

Conclusion

The stakeholder analysis is a great tool and helps lots of companies. The problem with it is that most companies only look at the situation when everything goes according to plan, which it doesn’t all the time. Make sure you have some kind of way to handle these situations as well to manage the stakeholders even better.

Published by:

Integrate Quality in Your Company Strategy

Quality is a key pillar in every organization. When a company delivers inferior Quality, it will be out of business quite soon. Hence, maintaining high-quality products and services is very important. However, getting Quality Management deeply embedded in the organization isn’t always easy. Everybody within the organization needs to understand his/her impact on the Quality and, more importantly, the perception of Quality of the customer. Quality should be embedded in every part of the business to truly deliver the best Quality possible.

Quality Consistency

Especially when the organization gets larger and more people are involved in the products and services, maintaining consistent Quality levels can become hard. This is when having a clear vision of what Quality means to the company becomes essential. Creating this vision should not be simply handed over to the Quality Manager—this is a job for Top Management. A properly functioning Quality Management System is critical in this. Having more people touching the product and/or service means that there is more room for inconsistencies. We are all human, so we will not deliver constant Quality, which is fine. As an organization, it is important to keep the minimum Quality level steady, regardless of who is doing the job. This is guaranteed by creating proper Quality checks.

Top Management 

The involvement of Top Management in the strategy is one of the most critical aspects. Top Management has to show their dedication and focus on Quality within the organization. Getting this involvement isn’t always easy, but with some techniques, this is doable. Some great tips are:

  • Using data to show Top Management how Quality performs
  • Show how customers value the Top Quality
  • Show the costs of not having Quality 

These are just a few points to use, but there is much more. The type of indicators come from anywhere in the company: logistics, production, sales or HR. This clearly shows that Quality is embedded in every part of the company. The exact triggers are, of course, also dependent on the personality of the people in Top Management. Make sure you communicate with them in a way that is in line with their personality.

Employee Involvement

Yes, Top Management involvement is critical, but without involvement from the employees, Quality Management isn’t working either. The employees are the people that do the job and see when things are going right or wrong. They are crucial in having a Quality Culture. They need to look at everything they do through Quality glasses, which will really increase the overall Quality. Never ever forget to make them part of the Quality strategy and translate the Quality to clear things they need to do.

Published by:

How to use data to select the best improvement projects

Possibly one of the hardest things to do is make a selection of all the possible improvement projects that are possible for the company. Talks with quality and safety managers showed that this topic is pretty high on their list. A lot of you struggle with managing internal projects/initiatives and how to prioritize them. Prioritizing projects and knowing where to assign resources is more of an art than a science and the road to the result might not be linear. It is important to balance short-term gains with long-term impact.

Start with Data

The number one input to make a good call is having the data. It should be possible to find out where things go wrong and how much the financial implications are. It would be even better if there is data available on different root causes that caused the issues. All the data can be analyzed and ordered to be helpful in making the right decision on which improvement projects utilizes the resources the best.

Selecting Projects

When selecting projects, it is always good to look at perceived value but also to look critically at the time required implementing the improvement project. Some great criteria to look for are:

  • Time required.
  • Impact on the business.
  • Impact for customers.

These can be applied in any particular order and should be in line with company goals. When there are already projects going on, a new high-impact project might not be the best choice.

Short-Term Gains

The time needed to implement and verify the results is an important aspect when selecting the projects to work on. Of course, projects with a high financial benefit and a short time period are the gems but also most of the times are already finished.

Short-term improvement plans with a positive impact for the customers are even better. These will help boost customer satisfaction or customer loyalty, both of which are very important for the continuity of the company.

Internal process improvements are more important to streamline the internal process, which could result in a positive effect for the customers. They are essentially implemented to improve the operations. These projects can be hard to find resources for because not all the losses of time in the process are always crystal clear. Here, data is very important because the data will help in proving the importance of the changes. Also, these projects require some willingness to change by employees, which will lead to resistance.

Long Term ROI

When we look for more long-term improvements with a longer ROI it can be hard to find the required resources. These plans require a completely different approach. Due to the long-term impact on the company, it is good to align them with the company’s vision and make them strategic for the organization. This can be done regardless of the size of the company. These projects require significant buy-in from the company hence top management involvement is key in this.

Long-Term Impact on Product

Then there are the projects that have a long-term impact on the product or service the company produces. These projects will have major benefits over the long haul for customers and business. Most of the time the R&D department does these projects but they can also be initiated by quality when it comes to production improvement. However, a close collaboration between engineers and quality is very important. The drawback is the long development time which requires serious resources. A clear ROI is important in this case.

Conclusion

In the end, it all comes down to internal resources and how to deploy them. As long as decisions are based on data that has been collected by the company, they are backed with some sort of evidence. Of course you shouldn’t stare blind on the data because there could be opportunities that haven’t been part of the data collection until now.

Published by:

How to Set Great Quality Objectives

Quality objectives are measurable goals and the base of long-term quality improvement planning. After setting a target, simply hoping that changes occur to achieve the goal is not an effective way to improve a QMS. You need to work towards that goal.

Make it SMART

Once you’ve determined which products or processes you want to monitor, measure, and improve, you need to make sure that your quality objectives are achieved effectively. To have the best chance of achieving these goals, I would recommend you to use the SMART method. This method states that all quality objectives need to be Specific, Measurable, Agreed, Realistic, and Time-based. Here’s how you do this: 

Specific: Describethe quality objective as specific as possible so that everyone in the organization understands it. Rather than striving “to reduce production defects,” a better description should be “to reduce production defects by 10% in the engine assembly line”. To test whether it’s specific enough, you can try to see if your goal could be interpreted differently. If so, your goal is not yet well formulated. 

Measurable: Without measuring your goals, how can you determine if an objective is achieved? To show visible improvement, it’s important to express this in percentages or numbers. For instance:  

  • Reduce production defects by 10%
  • Obtain 90% customer on-time-delivery

Agreed: Objectives can’t be achieved if they’re created inside a vacuum. Top management buy-in is crucial in setting quality objectives, and make sure they’re communicated throughout your organization so relevant parties are made aware. All employees of the organization need to agree that the goals are achievable. 

Realistic: Setting unrealistic goals is never a good idea. You aren’t going to motivate your employees by telling them you want to go from 20% production defects to zero. Especially when you don’t have the resources to support this level of improvement. To keep everybody satisfied, set realistic goals—this will motivate them to put in a little bit of extra effort next time. 

Time-based: Finally, to be truly effective, objectives must have a specific deadline for results. Without a timeline, goals might be easily forgotten when overshadowed by day-to-day activities. For example, “reduce production defects in the engine assembly line by 10% in the next year”. 

Quality objectives can be established for any process and can be specific to a department, team, or project, as long as they are relevant to your QMS. Always make sure that quality objectives are properly communicated throughout your entire organization so relevant parties are made aware. 

Published by:

Workshop: Time Pressure and the Effect on Quality & Safety

On Wednesday 22 May, we organized a workshop on time pressure and the effect on quality and safety. Time pressure can have a major impact on quality and safety, which can lead to serious accidents. In most cases where odd jobs have to be completed quickly, there is stress, as a result of which employees no longer think clearly and end up in unsafe situations. 

How can we teach people to deal with time pressure and not to start with an unsafe situation? This happens in all industries, whether you work in construction or in a production company. The business must run, but not at all costs. In this post I will give you a good overview of the topics discussed. 

What Is Time Pressure?

Time pressure can arise during work when a large or too complex job has to be done within a certain time frame. For example, a person might feel under pressure if the demands of their job (such as hours or responsibilities) are greater than they can comfortably manage. Time pressure is a part (or cause) of work-related stress. This often results in accidents, absenteeism, or quality problems.

How Time Pressure Is Related to Accidents

Time pressure is often the cause of accidents in the workplace. A number of common examples of how time pressure can lead to accidents are: 

  • The production must be finished in time in order to achieve the quality objectives and to keep top management satisfied. 
  • Wrong materials that are not intended for this purpose are used to complete a job on time. 
  • Signals about unsafe working are not picked up with the associated risks. 

The Importance of a Safety Culture

To deal with time pressure, it’s crucial to have an overall safety culture in place. Employees must have a shared vision when it comes to safety. Make sure to create an environment in which safety topics are negotiable. It’s key that all employees have faith in each other at all levels of the organization, in particular, top management. Teach me how to build a safety culture in 6 easy steps.  Also, make sure people feel comfortable enough to speak out when they feel stressed. This openness is an absolute must if the company wants to reduce stress. 

Furthermore, it is important that management provides funds for these topics. The safety department needs time and money to come up with improvement plans when things go wrong, or rather, before things go wrong. It is always cheaper to prevent than to cure.

Collaborate

Good collaboration between contractors and clients is crucial to prevent time pressure. The following points apply to both contractors and clients: 

  1. Take enough time to take up an assignment; don’t create your own pitfall!

2.     Make clear agreements about safety (what are your rights and obligations?).

3.     It’s better to ask too many difficult questions than get one after an incident!

4.     Investigate each incident together in detail.

Celebrate 

Last but not least, celebrating success is vital. Reward employees for reporting incidents to encourage reporting rather than hiding issues. Therefore, start by celebrating achievements, such as a successful intervention or a toolbox meeting, to help promote long-term success. Also try to avoid sanctions, but be satisfied as long as your employees want to learn from their mistakes. 

The workshop was full of practical examples, so that those present could easily relate to the situation. In addition, the presentation contained useful tips to prevent time pressure and the consequences that you may have if you do not. Thanks again to Gerard Beijkirck for sharing his experience and giving the presentation!

Published by:

Change Management in Quality Management

The continuous improvement plans created have to be implemented properly to really add value. Coming up with the plan or idea is the easy part. Making sure the plan is fully implemented and supported by the organization is the hard part. To make a plan successful, change management is the key.

Personal Change

Most people resist change and prefer to keep working the way they are used to, regardless of the inefficiencies and struggles during their day-to-day activities. This means that the outcome of the plan comes down to psychology more than actual quality management. This makes it all the harder.

When an employee doesn’t see how the change improves their life, they simply tune out. In an organization this is very complex because of all the interactions. The small loss of time for one can be a huge time saver for the next. This setting makes it hard for people to accept the change because they don’t see the added value for them.

Organizational Change

When we look at the organizational level, change management starts to get very complex. As mentioned above, some people lose and others gain during this change. Certain employees need to do some additional work to make life easier for their colleagues down the hall. The problem is that the people that feel they lose something will resist relentlessly. This can harm the effectiveness of the project significantly. When someone doesn’t see the benefit instantly, it is crucial to show them the current situation and how the workload is divided among the different employees. Besides the workload, you can also show why things go wrong and put a dollar value on the issues that have been logged due to the problems

Also, mapping out the processes and showing the bottlenecks in the process is a great method to open the eyes of the employees. Even then, there will be a number of people that will resist the change. Top Management buy-in can become the key driver to convince the last set of people. When they support the project it will be a lot easier to make sure people move in the right direction.

Prevent Dead Projects

A lot of improvement plans get canceled due to the complexity that comes with change management. Employees don’t support or aren’t willing to change. Projected results are not reached due to poor change management and execution. This cannot be prevented all the time but certain things can be done to increase the likelihood of success.

Engagement

Engage key people in the project. Make them part of the project right when the project is still in the planning phase. When they are part of the project team they feel ownership and take responsibility during the implementation phase. This helps a lot to drive the change through the organization.

Communication

Clearly communicate the implications for the different roles in the company. Don’t sugarcoat it, when people have to do some additional work be upfront about it and show them why. This can be done by showing the actual data you have gathered on what goes wrong in the process. They will see why change is important when the losses are visual.

Use data

Use data to back-up your claims. Show the people how you came to a certain conclusion and why this change will have a positive effect on it. When you actually get the results you anticipated, make sure to celebrate it. This will give some credit for the next project and there will be a lot more in the future. 

A proper platform can be used as a guide during the change management project. An easy-to-use platform allows people to adopt the new situation more easily and the data coming out of it allows for instant proof why the new way of working is a step forward. Make sure the right solutions are in place to support your improvement projects.

Published by: